account

Why DON’T We Use This Revolutionary Technology?

In this post, I will discuss how to get Samsung FRP tools for PC. These tools function beautifully in the FRP lock subject, and each of the tools listed below has unique capabilities and the capacity to overcome the FRP lock. So, to reset FRP, download FRP Unlock tool and follow our easy steps.

Why DON’T We Use This Revolutionary Technology?

#DONT #RevolutionaryTechnology

“Mentour Now!”

Remove your personal information from the web at Use code MENTOURNOW for 20% …

source

Another method for FRP

The only method to deactivate a Samsung account from a phone without a password is to contact Samsung to locate and delete the account. If you wish to begin the procedure on your Samsung phone, follow the comprehensive instructions below.

  1. Unlock your phone, then launch the Samsung phone settings app from the app drawer.
  2. Scroll down until you see "Cloud and Accounts." Also, on the next page, select the "Accounts" tab.
  3. Then, from the choices, select "Samsung Accounts" and then "My profile." When prompted to enter your email address and password on the account screen, select "Forgot your ID and Password." A popup will appear on the screen; from there, select your preferred browser.
  4. A prompted browser prompts you to enter your ID and password, as well as your email address. After that, Samsung will send you an email with a link to reset your password.
  5. Return to your Samsung account settings and select "Remove Account" from the top-right menu bar.

 

To see the full content, share this page by clicking one of the buttons below

Related Articles

22 Comments

  1. How is that even possible even with a catastrofic event. why sinple cables and pulleis are not part of the ultiamte redundant armored system ?
    In WWII we built planes that could return home totally destroyed. How we lost this engineering intelligence?

  2. Black swan events are interesting. Originally the term black swan was used to describe an impossibility. Swans are only ever white. And then in the late 1600s, sailors discovered a species of black swans in Australia. This caused the meaning of a "black swan" event to change – instead now meaning an unlikely event that is nearly impossible to predict (but actually happens).

  3. NASA did some work on a C17 to fly with disabled or damaged flight control systems using a Neural net to fly the aircraft. I designed the data recorder that was used to collect training data and test flight results.

  4. Ideally, we will be eliminating control surfaces in favor of differential thrust, with the mechanical surfaces adjusting for speed , flaps and slats,. and for landing. Though the engines might be moved a bit more outboard, the plane would be much simplified, made lighter and stronger, and failure rates proportionally reduced. Thanks for your informative vid.

  5. This system shouldn't even have to be certified, at least not till its presence becomes a requirement. A potentially malfunctioning system that allows the aircraft to be controlled without any hydraulics is better than none.

  6. Pretty crazy. The bureaucracy failed us by being too lax in the case of the 737 Max, and then it fails us by being too strict in the case of PCS. Regulations and enforcement of regulations is why air travel is so safe today, but sometimes humans get in the way of the best applications of regulations. Fortunately, full loss of control is still very rare. And I suppose when hydraulic systems become totally secondary, as in the case of a Fly by Wire system with totally electrical actuators, maybe it will become even rarer. But in the tail, I suppose a bunch of fiber-optics could be severed just as easily as a bunch of hydraulic lines….

  7. If certifying a system that can actually control the plane is very difficult, what about a system that only tells the pilots what engine inputs to make? I'm thinking a small separate computer that receives inputs from the real systems, but has no ability at all to send commands or control inputs. Its output would be a strip of LED lights next to each throttle track, and when the system is active, pilot flying concentrates on flying, making inputs to the autopilot, while the pilot not flying controls the throttles, moving them when and where the LEDs lit by the passive PCA computer indicate, thus translating the pilot's control inputs to the engine-only equivalents.

    Since such a system would have no flight control authority itself, it should be much easier to certify, right?

  8. Modern aircraft have the computing power and basically the essential electrical system necessary for integrating the PCA system with automatic activation in the event of critical hydraulic systems failure. Not having the PCA system in modern aircraft makes as much sense as pilot ejection system not being equipped with a parachute. There should be an emergency use certification for life saving systems such as PCA.

Leave a Reply to @MentourNow Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button